Guamanian/Chamorro vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Czechoslovakians
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
69.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,488,068 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 4.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 54.7% |
Range | 65.6% | 51.9% |
Mean | 20.1% | 24.4% |
Median | 14.9% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 32.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Costa Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Albania (16.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Colombian (16.1%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 55.4 /100 | #167 | Average 16.3% |
South Americans | 55.3 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 53.6 /100 | #169 | Average 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |