Jordanian vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Czechoslovakians
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,479,889 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 54.7% |
Range | 41.4% | 51.9% |
Mean | 16.0% | 24.4% |
Median | 13.0% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 32.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), English (15.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.2%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and South African (15.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |