Turkish vs Burmese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Burmese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Burmese
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Burmese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,653,022 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 2.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Burmese |
Minimum | 2.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 20.9% | 23.5% |
Range | 18.0% | 22.2% |
Mean | 8.3% | 8.2% |
Median | 7.8% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 10.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Burmese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and Korean (9.9%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |