Macedonian vs Burmese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Burmese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Burmese
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Burmese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,583,851 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,653,022 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 0.56%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.75% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 20.3% | 23.5% |
Range | 19.6% | 22.2% |
Mean | 7.6% | 8.2% |
Median | 7.6% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 10.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Burmese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |