Soviet Union vs Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Tlingit-Haida
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Soviet Union
Tlingit-Haida
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,333,279 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,606,017 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.79%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 3.5% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 21.5% | 49.6% |
Mean | 12.4% | 16.8% |
Median | 11.2% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 25.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 18.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Italy (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |