Soviet Union vs Tlingit-Haida Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Tlingit-Haida
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Tlingit-Haida
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Tlingit-Haida Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,848,336 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 12.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 10.8% | 25.7% |
Range | 8.2% | 24.0% |
Mean | 5.3% | 8.0% |
Median | 5.7% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.030%), German (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Spaniard (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |