Soviet Union vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Osage
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Soviet Union
Osage
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,333,279 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 25.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Osage |
Minimum | 3.5% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 67.2% |
Range | 21.5% | 60.5% |
Mean | 12.4% | 21.1% |
Median | 11.2% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Italy (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |