Serbian vs Turkish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Turkish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Turks
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Turkish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,465,606 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Serbian | Turkish |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 20.8% | 20.9% |
Range | 19.8% | 18.0% |
Mean | 9.3% | 8.3% |
Median | 8.4% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Turks by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Austrian (10.1%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |