Serbian vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Czechoslovakian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Czechoslovakians
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,465,606 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,409,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 20.8% | 37.0% |
| Range | 19.8% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 12.4% |
| Median | 8.4% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Czechoslovakians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Australia (10.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Paraguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and English (10.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |