Serbian vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Turks
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,492,629 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 32.4% | 22.9% |
| Range | 30.9% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.0% |
| Median | 9.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |