Romanian vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Romanians
Turks
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,651,231 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 59.5% | 22.9% |
| Range | 58.0% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 17.9% | 10.0% |
| Median | 12.5% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |