Costa Rican vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Yugoslavian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Yugoslavians
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.59% |
Maximum | 31.0% | 26.2% |
Range | 29.8% | 25.6% |
Mean | 10.2% | 9.3% |
Median | 9.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Yugoslavians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |