Salvadoran vs Australian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Australian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Australians
21.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Australian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 394,529,574 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 7.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Australian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 54.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.2% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 31.8% |
| Median | 21.5% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Portugal (21.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Welsh (22.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |