Salvadoran vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Guamanian/Chamorro
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Guamanians/Chamorros
21.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
13.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 394,529,574 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,498,532 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Salvadoran | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 1.6% | 14.3% |
Maximum | 54.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.2% | 85.7% |
Mean | 21.2% | 32.5% |
Median | 21.5% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 37.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 18.0% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Guamanians/Chamorros by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Portugal (21.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and English (21.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Ecuadorian (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |