Dominican vs Australian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Dominican
Australian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Dominicans
Australians
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Australian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,852,578 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 24.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dominican | Australian |
| Minimum | 10.3% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 78.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 67.9% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 29.2% | 31.8% |
| Median | 25.3% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.1% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.4% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |