Romanian vs Dutch Female Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
Dutch
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Romanians
Dutch
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Dutch Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,651,231 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,347,784 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.90%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Dutch |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 59.5% | 33.9% |
Range | 58.0% | 33.3% |
Mean | 17.9% | 10.5% |
Median | 12.5% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Dutch by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |