Puget Sound Salish vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Ugandans
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,841,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Ugandan |
Minimum | 8.6% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 40.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 32.2% | 94.5% |
Mean | 20.9% | 23.7% |
Median | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |