Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Uganda Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Uganda
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Uganda
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Uganda Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,841,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,509,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Immigrants from Uganda |
Minimum | 8.6% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 40.8% | 66.7% |
Range | 32.2% | 61.2% |
Mean | 20.9% | 22.5% |
Median | 20.0% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Uganda by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |