Potawatomi vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Ugandans
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,128,291 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 21.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Ugandan |
Minimum | 9.1% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.9% | 94.5% |
Mean | 42.8% | 23.7% |
Median | 35.3% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.3% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.9% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.5% | 17.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |