Potawatomi vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Cherokee
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,128,291 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Cherokee |
Minimum | 9.1% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.9% | 90.0% |
Mean | 42.8% | 37.0% |
Median | 35.3% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.3% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 42.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.2% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.5% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |