Immigrants from Australia vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Cherokee
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,453,715 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 32.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Cherokee |
Minimum | 3.5% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.5% | 90.0% |
Mean | 28.1% | 37.0% |
Median | 21.4% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 42.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |