Nepalese vs Tsimshian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
Tsimshian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
Tsimshian
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Tsimshian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.14%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nepalese | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 31.9% | 21.8% |
| Range | 27.2% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 13.7% |
| Median | 12.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |