Immigrants from Ghana vs Tsimshian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Tsimshian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Tsimshian
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Tsimshian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,744,013 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.99%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.51% | 8.5% |
Maximum | 38.5% | 21.8% |
Range | 38.0% | 13.2% |
Mean | 12.8% | 13.7% |
Median | 11.3% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 16.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |