Nepalese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Male Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,258,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Minimum | 4.7% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 31.9% | 30.5% |
Range | 27.2% | 26.6% |
Mean | 13.4% | 14.5% |
Median | 12.1% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |