Tongan vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Chickasaw
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,377,778 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 39.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.5% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 35.8% |
| Median | 18.2% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tongans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |