Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Costa Ricans
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,122,689 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 5.1% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 52.0% | 69.6% |
Range | 46.9% | 63.1% |
Mean | 19.9% | 25.8% |
Median | 18.6% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 30.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |