Austrian vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Austrian
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Austrians
Costa Ricans
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,015,533 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Austrian | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 14.3% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 56.8% | 69.6% |
Range | 42.4% | 63.1% |
Mean | 31.8% | 25.8% |
Median | 30.1% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.9% | 30.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Austrians and Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |