Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Costa Ricans
21.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
11.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,125,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 4.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.3% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 52.4% | 69.6% |
Range | 51.1% | 63.1% |
Mean | 20.1% | 25.8% |
Median | 18.1% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 30.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines are Immigrants from Barbados (21.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |