French vs Icelander Female Poverty
COMPARE
French
Icelander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French
Icelanders
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
French vs Icelander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 571,140,753 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.82%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French | Icelander |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 33.3% |
Range | 98.2% | 32.9% |
Mean | 18.1% | 11.8% |
Median | 14.5% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to French and Icelanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |