Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from Hong Kong
8.2%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,533,379 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 16.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from India | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 15.6% | 15.8% |
Range | 14.9% | 14.5% |
Mean | 5.8% | 8.4% |
Median | 5.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (8.7%, a difference of 6.2%), Thai (8.7%, a difference of 6.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 8.7%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |