Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from North Macedonia
8.2%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,533,379 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,289,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 15.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from India | Immigrants from North Macedonia |
Minimum | 0.74% | 0.15% |
Maximum | 15.6% | 17.7% |
Range | 14.9% | 17.6% |
Mean | 5.8% | 7.9% |
Median | 5.4% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 10.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Immigrants from North Macedonia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (8.7%, a difference of 6.2%), Thai (8.7%, a difference of 6.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 8.7%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |