Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Immigrants from Hong Kong
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,600,632 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Europe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 0.64% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 43.1% | 15.8% |
Range | 42.5% | 14.5% |
Mean | 11.3% | 8.4% |
Median | 8.9% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |