Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Mexican American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Mexican American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Mexican American Indians
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Mexican American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,310,787 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,470,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.99%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 0.58% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 56.3% | 68.4% |
Range | 55.7% | 67.9% |
Mean | 16.6% | 17.6% |
Median | 14.9% | 16.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 20.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Mexican American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |