Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tongan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Tongan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Tongans
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tongan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,180,585 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,821,565 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 0.010%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Tongan |
Minimum | 0.73% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 17.6% |
Range | 18.3% | 15.9% |
Mean | 7.4% | 7.8% |
Median | 6.7% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tongans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (7.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (7.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |