Polish vs Tongan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Tongan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Poles
Tongans
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Tongan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,842,099 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,821,565 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Tongan |
Minimum | 0.85% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 39.6% | 17.6% |
Range | 38.7% | 15.9% |
Mean | 8.1% | 7.8% |
Median | 6.5% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 9.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Tongans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |