Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Indian (Asian) Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Indian (Asian)
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Indians (Asian)
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Indian (Asian) Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,180,585 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,769,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 0.55%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.73% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 17.3% |
Range | 18.3% | 15.8% |
Mean | 7.4% | 7.1% |
Median | 6.7% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indians (Asian) by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Swiss (7.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Sweden (7.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (7.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Serbia (7.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Moldova (7.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |