Immigrants from China vs South American Indian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
South American Indian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
South American Indians
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
38.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs South American Indian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,455,459 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 9.1%, a difference of 16.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | South American Indian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 32.2% |
Range | 21.2% | 30.7% |
Mean | 7.5% | 9.3% |
Median | 6.9% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 10.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (9.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (9.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Morocco (9.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Hmong (9.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Colombian (9.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |
Hmong | 40.2 /100 | #181 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.2 /100 | #182 | Average 9.1% |
Uruguayans | 39.2 /100 | #183 | Fair 9.1% |
South American Indians | 38.7 /100 | #184 | Fair 9.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 38.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 9.1% |
Colombians | 36.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 9.2% |
Delaware | 35.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 9.2% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 34.0 /100 | #188 | Fair 9.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 32.1 /100 | #189 | Fair 9.2% |
Arabs | 31.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 9.2% |
Ugandans | 28.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 9.3% |