Immigrants from China vs Black/African American Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Black/African American
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Blacks/African Americans
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Black/African American Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 562,121,260 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 70.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Black/African American |
Minimum | 1.0% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 35.9% |
Range | 21.2% | 28.7% |
Mean | 7.5% | 15.7% |
Median | 6.9% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Central American Indian (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Yakama (13.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Colville (13.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Paiute (13.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and Immigrants from Dominica (12.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 12.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 12.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 13.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 13.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 13.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 13.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |