Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Pakistan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Pakistan
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,475,243 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 2.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 21.0% |
Range | 21.2% | 19.6% |
Mean | 7.5% | 7.8% |
Median | 6.9% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Pakistan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.37%), Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from North America (7.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Europe (7.9%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from England (8.0%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |