Icelander vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
White/Caucasian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Whites/Caucasians
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,582,417 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.885 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 31.3% |
| Range | 56.5% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 14.2% |
| Median | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Whites/Caucasians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |