Immigrants from Hong Kong vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
White/Caucasian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Whites/Caucasians
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,582,417 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.885 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 16.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 8.1% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 31.3% |
Range | 14.5% | 23.2% |
Mean | 8.4% | 14.2% |
Median | 8.6% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 16.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 4.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |