Icelander vs Immigrants from France Male Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from France
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from France
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
75.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from France Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,760,426 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.93%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from France |
Minimum | 0.64% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 57.1% | 63.6% |
Range | 56.5% | 60.5% |
Mean | 12.2% | 14.5% |
Median | 10.3% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 14.7% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from France by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |