French American Indian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Female Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Immigrants from Jamaica
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Immigrants from Jamaica
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,968,938 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,557,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Immigrants from Jamaica |
Minimum | 0.16% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 40.0% | 50.6% |
Range | 39.8% | 45.1% |
Mean | 17.2% | 15.9% |
Median | 16.2% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Immigrants from Jamaica by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.74%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |