Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from Jamaica Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Armenia
Immigrants from Jamaica
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Armenia
Immigrants from Jamaica
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from Jamaica Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,710,578 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,557,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 3.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Armenia | Immigrants from Jamaica |
Minimum | 2.5% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 29.5% | 50.6% |
Range | 26.9% | 45.1% |
Mean | 14.0% | 15.9% |
Median | 13.4% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Jamaica by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.74%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |