Filipino vs Maltese Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Maltese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Maltese
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Maltese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,160,394 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,440,716 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.42%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Maltese |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 25.2% |
Range | 17.6% | 24.1% |
Mean | 8.1% | 8.4% |
Median | 8.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Maltese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.87%), Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |