Filipino vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Chinese
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,160,394 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 6.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.6% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 26.1% |
Range | 17.6% | 22.7% |
Mean | 8.1% | 10.2% |
Median | 8.4% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |