Filipino vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Filipino
Maltese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Filipinos
Maltese
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,988,571 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,189,723 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 18.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Maltese |
Minimum | 0.83% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 31.9% |
Range | 18.1% | 30.3% |
Mean | 7.9% | 12.5% |
Median | 7.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 15.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Maltese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from India (10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Thai (11.7%, a difference of 5.1%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |