Ecuadorian vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Mexican American Indian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Mexican American Indians
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,108,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,307,658 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.75%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 26.3% |
Range | 20.5% | 24.9% |
Mean | 10.5% | 13.1% |
Median | 10.0% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Mexican American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |