Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Western Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from Western Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from Western Africa
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Western Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,108,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,059,325 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.30%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Western Africa |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 29.6% |
Range | 20.5% | 28.4% |
Mean | 10.5% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Immigrants from Western Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |