Spanish American vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American
Mexican American Indian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Spanish Americans
Mexican American Indians
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Mexican American Indian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,138,189 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,307,658 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 3.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 26.3% |
Range | 96.6% | 24.9% |
Mean | 16.8% | 13.1% |
Median | 10.5% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Mexican American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |